Several months back when NCIS aired the first of their 'terrorist' eps, I turned to my housemate and said:

"He's Israeli, he's Mossad, and he's setting up some sort of sting operation against Hamas or Al Qaeda."

And I was right.

So why aren't *I* writing for TV? ;-D
Tags:

From: [identity profile] imkalena.livejournal.com


Um, because you're writing the hot smut they won't show on tv, for we thousands of grateful screaming (make that whimpering) fans?
ext_3548: (Default)

From: [identity profile] shayheyred.livejournal.com


Well, damn. I never expected it, and I am not sure I understand it, plot-wise, even now.

But the shot to the shoulder shocked the hell out of me. I applauded and was appalled, all at the same time.

From: [identity profile] bluster.livejournal.com


When Gibbs shot him I turned to the cat and said, "That was for Gerald!" Of course, the cat just looked at me and went back to licking his butt. *g*

I really liked the ending, but I wasn't all that happy with the rest of the episode. It felt as if they had a really cool idea for ending the saga, but no idea of a coherent and intelligent way to get there.

From: [identity profile] kelliem.livejournal.com


"That was for Gerald!"

Yes!! I loved that.

It felt as if they had a really cool idea for ending the saga, but no idea of a coherent and intelligent way to get there.

Although on that score, it was better than last week's Smallville that's for sure. Though yes, it was sort of one of those "And then a MIRACLE occurs!" episodes. *sigh* It needed to be a 2-parter so they could have slowed down and made things make more sense.

From: [identity profile] bluster.livejournal.com


I think it would have been better if a lot of the information had been discovered slowly, over the past month to six weeks worth of episodes. Just a little bit more added to each episode to build the suspense. Then, yes, they could have used the finale to focus on his taking Kate and the hunt for her/him.


From: [identity profile] kelliem.livejournal.com


Yes! That would definitely have played much better.

From: [identity profile] ardent-muses.livejournal.com


When Gibbs shot him I turned to the cat and said, "That was for Gerald!" Of course, the cat just looked at me and went back to licking his butt. *g*

ROFLMAO!

I agree with you that there was something wrong there. They had a four or five act story, but they left out act three. Considering what they were trying to do, it needed to be longer.

I think Bellasario also blew the characterization of the terrorist guy. He was quite a different personality in this episode than before IMO, and it didn't make a ton of sense to me. If they wanted him to be a cold, ruthless asshole with no redeeming qualities, then why give him so much personal magnetism (and "kind eyes") in the first one?

And then, of course, why drag this out all season and resolve it in a single day?::sigh::

But there was some lovely Ducky, all the same. Mmm.

From: [identity profile] kelliem.livejournal.com


I didn't see that much difference between the character before and this time-- I mean, he SHOT Gerald, damn it. (I still want Gerald back. Don't like Geekboy.) So that didn't bother me. But yeah, resolving it in a single day was weird.

I loved Ducky stealing french fries. :)

Random Q: Why do all the higher-level bosses in this show have weird names?

(btw, my email is down right now)

From: [identity profile] kelliem.livejournal.com


Well, damn. I never expected it, and I am not sure I understand it, plot-wise, even now.

They tipped their hand when they mentioned that the Mossad had nothing on him way back when. I knew right then that they were covering for him, and there were a limited number of reasons why they would do that. What did you find confusing tonight?

But the shot to the shoulder shocked the hell out of me. I applauded and was appalled, all at the same time.

Man, me too! First off, I was shocked that they let him go in there armed. But it was very Gibbs.
ext_3548: (Default)

From: [identity profile] shayheyred.livejournal.com


But, but, when they said the Mossad had nothing on him, they didn't know who he was, yet, right? I just sort of missed the links between reveals. And I still don't know why someone undercover would shoot Gerald and kill a soldier while making an escape.(original show) Also, after he shot Marta, what happened to the rest of the cell? And what was he going to do with the missiles, once they determined they couldn't identify the copter? And how can we believe they targeted kidnapping Kate when they had no idea she'd be on the street or that she'd decide to get in their car? And if they didn't kidnap her, what was the original plan to get out of the mission?

Holes, holes, holes.

From: [identity profile] kelliem.livejournal.com


But, but, when they said the Mossad had nothing on him, they didn't know who he was, yet, right?

Right. But I guessed that the only reason the Mossad, the world's most efficient security organization, wouldn't know who he was, was if he was one of them and they were covering it up.

And I still don't know why someone undercover would shoot Gerald and kill a soldier while making an escape.

To prove to Hamas and Al Qaeda that he was for real. Pretty drastic, but effective.

Also, after he shot Marta, what happened to the rest of the cell?

They went off to fire the missiles, and the CIA took them out after Kate called in what was going on.

And what was he going to do with the missiles, once they determined they couldn't identify the copter?

They were intended to be a decoy, probably to shift the copters to a different location. However, he never intended for them to ID the copter to begin with, it was all faked.

And how can we believe they targeted kidnapping Kate when they had no idea she'd be on the street or that she'd decide to get in their car? And if they didn't kidnap her, what was the original plan to get out of the mission?

Good questions, those I can't answer. :-)

From: [identity profile] tinriddick.livejournal.com

since i never send feedback


and the opportunity has been presented...

So why aren't *I* writing for TV? ;-D

Because your entirely, too intelligent, Talented, Thoughtful, considerate of/concerned with the characters you choose to write about. You follow a plot line though without just stopping in the middle and leaving it (especially if it is something traumatic/life changing/just freaky)to write something else in that whiplash giving way most tv writers do. You manage to write characters with a consistency and realism not often found (anymore) on tv, as in Liam...uh Greg on C.S.I, You don't insult your readers intelligence, nor do you talk down to the reader. You don't do the completely obvious in your work, you take a fresh approach to things (Fraser not being happy (perfect) in Canada, Hell you wrote a story with Billy Talent that just rocked and totally 'got' that what Joe did was NOT good/happy/something to just overlook, i could go on but...). Your stories can hold the readers interest, and evoke emotion without stooping to blatant manipulation (i know it's a movie but can you say 'Pay it Forward'? Such a completely manipulative ending i actually yelled at the tv ... obvious...stupid...argh!! But a good example of what i mean. i know what i'm supposed to see/feel ramming it down my thought is not necessary.) You humor isn't one reworked fart joke. You have a soul, the way you write the characters feels true to them and it seems that they too have souls.
YOU are FAR too good a writer for tv...
and ... *mumble*... you write really great/hot gay sex (reference to earlier sqick post, and you do it without the constant use of spit for lube, imagine amazing sex and not a lugy to be seen ... *Happy happy sigh*)
And if tv isn't ready for good normal gay characters, trust me they are not ready for you ;D
You are a Far better writer and what you write is Way better than the normal tv fair.

From: [identity profile] cesperanza.livejournal.com

Re: since i never send feedback


I clicked here to write, "Uh, cause you write better than TV?" only to find out that I'd been scooped. So, you know--what she said. *g*

From: [identity profile] tinriddick.livejournal.com

Re: since i never send feedback


Removing the mention of specific stories, and changing the comment about humor to something along the lines of; while some of your stories can be a triffle dark, your humor has on occassion reached 'laugh out loud' status. Everything in the comment goes for you too.
*not the best 'feedback' you'll ever get (which is partly why i rarely send it) but it is true ^G^ and well meant... sorry i made you share ^blush^*


From: [identity profile] cesperanza.livejournal.com

Re: since i never send feedback


Aww, yer sweet. And we should make a form.

Dear Writer! I love [hate] your dark [hilarious] stories in the ________ fandom. Please write more!

etc.

From: [identity profile] tinriddick.livejournal.com

Re: since i never send feedback


i sooo wish *G* as someone who's hands and brain refuse to work together when trying to send feedback to anyone who writes as well (let alone people who fall into 'cool' catagory) as you two do & it's incredebly intimdating. Add to that the little voice that announces "your bothering them, shut up!" (kind of like it is now *blush*) and it makes it nearly impossible to tell some one "Damn girl, i had to quick lie to x about the misty eyes/choked back laughter/happy sigh your story caused". Then again maybe you should leave off the feedback form and give a little 'summary for the narrow minded' at the begining of each story so that when the reader is caught out (by people who don't like boys kissing or people who read about them) they don't have to try and think of something on the spot to explain...
OK shutting up now...sorry for being a pest. :)

From: [identity profile] kelliem.livejournal.com


Never EVER think you're bothering us! It totally makes our day to hear that someone liked what we've done. Anyone who says otherwise is LYING THROUGH THEIR TEETH. Or has seriously low self-esteem. And you're not a pest. ;-)

And I'm not intimidating. I put my panties on one leg at a time just like everyone else. Well, except when I put them on the floor and... oh never mind. TMI. ;D

From: [identity profile] tinriddick.livejournal.com


I put my panties on one leg at a time just like everyone else. Well, except when I put them on the floor and...

... and open the legs with your toes, then lay down on your back and... {G} sorry, sorry... couldn't help it, had to say it(at least i didn't mention peach preserves). i know...going...going, sorry.

From: [identity profile] kelliem.livejournal.com


Ack! Thank you too. Is this "Embarrass Kellie Day" an no one told me?
.

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags