![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
You know, I'm not a Colin Farrell fan (he just seems way too full of himself for my taste) but this article I read on the IMDB today made me laugh for the underlined reason:
Irish heart-throb Colin Farrell's first full frontal movie scene has been cut by worried film bosses - after test audiences were transfixed by the size of his manhood. The Phone Booth hunk disrobed for scenes in upcoming drama A Home at the End of the World, but after seeing the stunned reaction of viewers at a recent screening, chiefs decided to chop the naughty images. And the news has been greeted with fury by self-confessed Romeo Farrell, who has demanded the scenes must be included in the DVD release of the film. A source tells British newspaper the Sun, "All you could hear were gasps when Colin appeared in his full frontal pose. The women were over-excited and the men looked really uncomfortable. It was such a sight it made it difficult to concentrate on the plot, so the decision was made to get rid of it." Even director Michael Mayer admits, "It was distracting." In the film, Farrell plays a bisexual man caught in a love triangle.
Does anyone else think it's amusing that seeing another guy's equipment makes your average guy THAT nervous?
Irish heart-throb Colin Farrell's first full frontal movie scene has been cut by worried film bosses - after test audiences were transfixed by the size of his manhood. The Phone Booth hunk disrobed for scenes in upcoming drama A Home at the End of the World, but after seeing the stunned reaction of viewers at a recent screening, chiefs decided to chop the naughty images. And the news has been greeted with fury by self-confessed Romeo Farrell, who has demanded the scenes must be included in the DVD release of the film. A source tells British newspaper the Sun, "All you could hear were gasps when Colin appeared in his full frontal pose. The women were over-excited and the men looked really uncomfortable. It was such a sight it made it difficult to concentrate on the plot, so the decision was made to get rid of it." Even director Michael Mayer admits, "It was distracting." In the film, Farrell plays a bisexual man caught in a love triangle.
Does anyone else think it's amusing that seeing another guy's equipment makes your average guy THAT nervous?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
From:
no subject
Besides, they can't get caught looking. 'Cause, you know. If you look, you're, you know. Questionable.
From:
no subject
And we'll get to see this movie when??
Or, rather, we'll get to see the DVD? :)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
But then, considering Colin's apparent equipment, it could simply be feelings of inadequacy. :)
From:
no subject
But the headline is what really got me: "Farrel's 'Huge' Member Cut from Film." Um, IMDB? Perhaps references to the male anatomy should not immediately be followed by words meaning "sever," unless you *really* want to distress approximately 49% of the population...
From:
no subject
From:
Hmm
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Though I like your idea.
From:
Re: Hmm
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Perhaps the straight men in the audience were perturbed by the fact that Farrell plays a bisexual. Probably if he was just screwing some girl on screen, they'd just be checking out his technique.
From:
no subject
Whatsamatta, guyts? Are you INSECURE ABOUT SEX? Do you have HANGUPS? What's so bad about some guy DISPLAYING HIS SEXUALITY?!
Let's seem, what other bullshit lines do they spew when women complain about the endless cavalcade of hemispherical, antigravity melons all over the fucking screen?
Men SUCK.
From:
no subject
There is actually a smuttier article about it found here.